RCS编辑给我的回信，这是什么意思呀？
我上个星期投到IC后，被告知说communication文章很少，然后我的投稿就被拒啦。伤心之后，转投RCS的DALTON，后来编辑给我来信说RCS系统有问题，没有得到我的文件，要我把文件作附件发给他。于是今天他给我如下回信，由于我是第一次投这些文章，所以不太了解，我个人猜测，信中的内容好像就是说明他确定了我的附件他已收到而已，对于文章到底如何还要进一步受审吧？
请各位了解的版友指点一下，当然我也已做好被拒后转投Eur. J. Inorg.Chem及ICC的可能性啦！
:'(:'(:'(
Dear Professor Chen
Communication Ref.: xxxxxxx
Title : xxxx
I have assigned your manuscript to your ReSourCe ID xxxxx. You can use your ReSourCe account to track your manuscript online and to submit your revised manuscript. Visit [url]www.rsc.org/ReSourCe[/url] to track your manuscript now. If you are new to ReSourCe or do not know your password, then you should request this to be sent to you from the ReSourCe web pages [url]http://www.rsc.org/Publishing/Resource/forgotpwd.cfm[/url]
I acknowledge receipt of this Communication. Please quote the reference number assigned to it in all future correspondence.
We aim to publish Communications within 12 weeks of receipt. To help us maintain and improve these rapid publication times please:
* Return any revised manuscript within 1 week of receipt of the referees’ comments (those submitted later that this may be considered as new Communications).
* Return proofs as soon as possible and no later than 1 week after receipt (corrections may be transmitted by FAX or e-mail if appropriate).
Please could you complete and return a Licence to Publish form if you have not already provided us with one. A copy of the licence form may be obtained from the World Wide Web at [url]http://www.rsc.org/AboutUs/Copyright/LicencetoPublishforjournals.asp[/url]
Kind Regards,
Natalie
Natalie Ford
Publishing Assistant
Dalton Transactions,CrystEngComm, CSR , Annual Reports, SPR ,
Tel: +44 (0) 1223 432317 Fax: +44 (0) 1223 420247
Dalton Transactions – the essential element. NOW WEEKLY!
[url]www.rsc.org/dalton[/url] It means they sent your paper to refrees. So it's not bad. Cross fingers! [quote]原帖由 [i]niuniu123[/i] 于 2006-11-14 11:42 发表
It means they sent your paper to refrees. So it's not bad. Cross fingers! [/quote]
谢谢牛牛老师！
东东也许不错，也许有点新，但投稿时碰到什么周瑜碰诸葛亮的事也没有法子！
现在能做的就是从高往低投啦！ "现在能做的就是从高往低投啦！"
I have practiced 从高往低投 very well one time!
Science-JACS-Chem Mat-....too Ashamed to say! :'( (No kidding!)
[quote]原帖由 [i]smithchencsc[/i] 于 2006-11-14 12:39 发表
谢谢牛牛老师！
东东也许不错，也许有点新，但投稿时碰到什么周瑜碰诸葛亮的事也没有法子！
现在能做的就是从高往低投啦！ [/quote] [quote]原帖由 [i]niuniu123[/i] 于 2006-11-14 13:05 发表
"现在能做的就是从高往低投啦！"
I have practiced 从高往低投 very well one time!
Science-JACS-Chem Mat-....too Ashamed to say! :'( (No kidding!)
[/quote]
老师是牛人,我绝对是新手!
如果我真的投到ICC的话,对我而言也是一次很很的锻炼,因为我第一次把ACS,RCS,WILEY,SCIENCEDIRECT的期刊全投完!
真的如此的话,也确实:
:'(:'(:'(
up, up, and up!!!
回复 #5 smithchencsc 的帖子
CHEM8里“牛人”很多，而我不在其列。看看我那“自由落体”式投稿就一目了然了。牛人没这样的。 稿件一直没有动，还没有送审！没有办法，只能等等看！
:(:(:(
[[i] 本帖最后由 smithchencsc 于 2006-11-22 21:02 编辑 [/i]] 刚从发贴时，感觉服务器不稳定，我放了一个图，结果是黑色的，本想再重新编辑一下的，没想到半小时内没有进得来！
再测试一下：
[[i] 本帖最后由 smithchencsc 于 2006-11-22 22:13 编辑 [/i]] 贴JPG格式文件不成功！
Warning: imagesx(): supplied argument is not a valid Image resource in /home/sear/domains/chem8.org/public_html/include/thumbpic.func.php on line 35
Warning: imagesy(): supplied argument is not a valid Image resource in /home/sear/domains/chem8.org/public_html/include/thumbpic.func.php on line 36
Warning: imagecopyresampled(): supplied argument is not a valid Image resource in /home/sear/domains/chem8.org/public_html/include/thumbpic.func.php on line 38
[[i] 本帖最后由 smithchencsc 于 2006-11-22 22:14 编辑 [/i]] Rar格式再测试： RAR格式可以！
服务器图像上传还有问题！
test
[[i] 本帖最后由 Metalcarbene 于 2006-11-22 23:04 编辑 [/i]] RCS被拒后,十天前投到ICC上!
早上起来看完金牌榜,看到羽毛球团体胜啦,后来再看看我老板的邮箱,没想到审稿人来信啦,请大家帮我分析一下,好像问题多多呀,可怕!
Dear prof. X X,
Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision. Also, I would suggest to leave the TGA figure in supplementary, and follow the comments of reviewers for revision.
Reviewers' comments:
Reviewer #1: The work presents the structure and some properties of zinc complex with an interesting, new ligand. I think it is worth publishing but I also list the problems that should be fixed first.
1) The quality of the figures -especially fig.2 - is very low. It makes pictures incomprehensible
2) I have not found the table with hydrogen bonds in cif - it SHOULD be included for the full description of the crystal structure
3) What are the authors' final conclusions concerning photoluminescent properties of the obtained compound - is the complex a promising candidate for the photoactive material?
4) For me the text is written clearly enough. There is only one phrase I do not understand i.e. „By administrating a reaction..." and I'd rather write "….utilizing ….which…" instead of "…with utilizing…..whose…"
5) Minor problems with references: 2c was published in (2004); 6e and 7a do not describe MOF but inorganic complexes and should be omitted; 9a - does it really give the description of influence of metal on the structure of MOFs?; 24b begins from p. 2397 not 239
I recommend the paper for publication in Inorganic Chemistry Communications after minor revision
Reviewer #2: The manuscript describes the synthethis, the characterization carried by x-ray diffraction, thermanl analisys and solid state emission spectroscopy of a new polymeric zinc complex.
As a whole the experimental data are roughly presented and scarcely commented. Thus, although the investigated compound is somehow quite interesting, the manuscript have to be severely improved to be considered for publication.
In particular the Authors should paid attention to the following points:
- the sketch of the tfpbbp formula should be added;
- the Zn(II) coordination sphere has to be better and clearly described: the difference between the Zn(1)-O(1) and the Zn(1)-O(2) bond length is very high and as the Zn(1)-O(2) distance (2.4094 A) could also account for a non-bonding interaction, the Zn(II) ion could be better described as in a pseudo-pentacoordinated geometry instead of a distorted bipyramid geometry. A comment should be added.
- Figure 2 is of very poor quality, could the Authors provide a clearest rapresentation of the 3D structure?
- Figure 3 is not essential, it should be omitted;
- The "Pictogram" is absolutely incomprehensible,
- The english has to be improved througout the whole text.
Concluding, the manuscript has to be deeply revised before acceptance. 第二个审稿人提出的问题,想请大家帮我看看,怎样表达才好?谢谢!
the Zn(II) coordination sphere has to be better and clearly described: the difference between the Zn(1)-O(1) and the Zn(1)-O(2) bond length is very high and as the Zn(1)-O(2) distance (2.4094 A) could also account for a non-bonding interaction, the Zn(II) ion could be better described as in a pseudo-pentacoordinated geometry instead of a distorted bipyramid geometry. A comment should be added
其实这个问题,新手我感觉上次在CHEM8也问过一个类似的问题:
[url]http://chem8.org/thread-587-1-1.html[/url]
当然那里只是讨论的五配位,而这里审稿人要求评价ZN-O键长的问题! some suggestions [quote]原帖由 [i]niuniu123[/i] 于 2006-12-8 13:38 发表
some suggestions [/quote]
这两天我到外面去啦，刚回家！
我同学也替我把审稿理见一一开啦，过程中，按第二审稿人说图文摘要含糊不清的问题，我们把摘要改啦。
谢谢牛牛老师对我的MS的进一步polish，我现在正按照修改的内容写cover letter!
实在不好意思！谢谢！ 昨天投了修改稿,
今天早上文章接受!
谢谢大家帮助新手!!! 祝你胜利！ :P :P :P :P
页:
[1]